The need of the U.S. Air Force for templates more precise than could be
    obtained by state-of-the-art methods of the late 1940s inspired John Parsons[1],
    President of the Parsons Works of Traverse City, Michigan, to propose that a by-
    the-numbers technique (commonly used by machinists of that era) be placed
    under servo control with positional data generated by a computer, thereby
    providing much more data than would be practical by means of hand calculations.
    His concept was to machine to setpoints as guides for subsequent manual
    finishing, that is, to speed up a manual process so more points could be included.
    Mr. Parsons' project was enjoined by the Servo Mechanisms Laboratory of the
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and redefined as interpolative
    positional control that caused the cutting tool to traverse a series of straight lines
    between defined points at a prescribed rate of travel. Thus, the cutting tool would
    be almost constantly on the programmed contour and would spend very little of
    its time making non-cutting moves.
    In the MIT scheme, a contour of constantly changing curvature was represented
    as a poly-line with the intersections between line segments being points on the
    curve, and the axial coordinates of these points were listed for execution in
    sequential order in the part program (much like the figure which results from
    connecting-the-dots in an activity book). The shorter the line segments the more
    accurately the poly-line would approximate the actual curve. Thus, MIT retained
    separation of programming from operations while redefining the servo control as
    interpolative, rather than discretionary, positioning. MIT demonstrated the first
    ever NC machine tool to a select group from the military, the aerospace industry,
    the machine tool industry and the technical media in September, 1952.
    At the time when MIT was developing numerical control, engineers at General
    Motors were putting position transducers on the lead screws of a conventional
    engine lathe and recording the motion of the axes as the machinist put the
    machine through its paces to make a workpiece. The machine was also fitted with
    a servo system that took data from the recording to reproduce the same
    sequence of motion to produce a second, third and more parts. This technique is
    called record/playback and it is reminiscent of a musician playing on a piano that
    has been modified to record the keystrokes on a paper chart which can be read
    by a player piano to reproduce the music. The popular novel Player Piano was
    inspired by this machine. The author, Kurt Vonnegut, was exposed to the
    machine when he worked as a publicist for General Electric.
    Record/playback is different from numerical control in that the program is
    produced by the machinist in the process of making the first part. The Air Force
    wanted numerical control and not record/playback because 1) the latter put the
    machinists who were union members in charge of program production, thus union
    strikes could result in unacceptable delays in military production, and 2)
    numerical control demonstrated the capability of producing complex parts that
    were not possible by the conventional manual methods used in the
    record/playback technique. The Air Force used its deep pockets to get its way
    and while American manufacturing may have been better served by the simpler
    Parsons concept or by record/playback, today this is a moot issue.
    The electronic files used to control NC and CNC machines are often in a format
    called G-code, after Gerber Scientific Instruments[2], a manufacturer of
    photoplotters and developer of the file format. The X-Y two-dimensional motion of
    photoplotters was extended to include the third Z axis, and along with special
    codes, allows milling machines to be steered in more than three axes. Many of
    the lines of text in the control files start with the ASCII letter G, thus the name;
    however, there are other commands that start with the letter D and M, as well as
    X and Y for coordinates. The file format became so widely used that it has been
    embodied in an EIA standard.




    The main difference from other computers are the special input/output
    arrangements. These connect the PLC to sensors and actuators. PLCs read limit
    switches, analog process variables (such as temperature and pressure), and the
    positions of complex positioning systems. Some even use machine vision. On the
    actuator side, PLCs operate electric motors, pneumatic or hydraulic cylinders or
    diaphragms, magnetic relays or solenoids, or analog outputs. The input/output
    arrangements may be built into a simple PLC, or the PLC may have external I/O
    modules attached to a computer network that plugs into the PLC.
    PLCs were invented as replacements for automated systems that would use
    hundreds or thousands of relays, cam timers, and drum sequencers. Often, a
    single PLC can be programmed to replace thousands of relays. Programmable
    controllers were initially adopted by the automotive manufacturing industry, where
    software revision replaced the re-wiring of hard-wired control panels when
    production models changed.



    Many of the earliest PLCs expressed all decision making logic in simple ladder
    logic which appeared similar to electrical schematic diagrams. The electricians
    were quite able to trace out circuit problems with schematic diagrams using
    ladder logic. This program notation was chosen to reduce training demands for
    the existing technicians. Other early PLCs used a form of instruction list
    programming, based on a stack-based logic solver.
    The functionality of the PLC has evolved over the years to include sequential
    relay control, motion control, process control, distributed control systems and
    networking. The data handling, storage, processing power and communication
    capabilities of some modern PLCs are approximately equivalent to desktop
    computers. PLC-like programming combined with remote I/O hardware, allow a
    general-purpose desktop computer to overlap some PLCs in certain applications.
    Under the IEC 61131-3 standard, PLCs can be programmed using standards-
    based programming languages. A graphical programming notation called
    Sequential Function Charts is available on certain programmable controllers.
Origin needs for PLC
Needs For PLC.
Look At This
Are you looking for
good
Articles
about....
Try these free to
republish.
You can use them
for your needs or
for friends or your
site.

CLICK HERE
Look At This
Down
load Free
Good
Books:
Go To
HELP THE WORLD
Click Here
base of base
Google
 
Web www.ykta.com
Copyright ©2003,  part of The YKTA Corporation, and its licensor's. All rights reserved.
the way of simple human dreams